Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 3:45:03 GMT
Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber 09.11.2009, 2009/16450 E., 2009/19112 K. It is understood from the criminal court decision in the file that the defendant was sentenced to fifteen years of imprisonment with the decision numbered 170-5 dated 14.01.2010 of Aydın 1st High Criminal Court for the crime of intentional murder committed on 05.07.2009. Although the material facts were proven by the defendant's confession and other evidence, the fact that the criminal court decision was not final was not deemed effective on the outcome. The act of intentional homicide is "humiliating" and, due to this nature, makes living together unbearable for the plaintiff spouse, and the plaintiff cannot be expected to live with someone who committed this crime. The reason for divorce stated in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code has been realized.
Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil France Telegram Number Data Chamber, 05.06.2012, 2011/21093 E., 2012/15178 K. The case concerns the request for divorce based on the legal grounds of committing a crime and living a dishonorable life as stated in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber 09.11.2009, 2009/16450 E., 2009/19112 K. It is understood from the criminal court decision in the file that the defendant was sentenced to fifteen years of imprisonment with the decision numbered 170-5 dated 14.01.2010 of Aydın 1st High Criminal Court for the crime of intentional murder committed on 05.07.2009.
Although the material facts were proven by the defendant's confession and other evidence, the fact that the criminal court decision was not final was not deemed effective on the outcome. The act of intentional homicide is "humiliating" and, due to this nature, makes living together unbearable for the plaintiff spouse, and the plaintiff cannot be expected to live with someone who committed this crime. The reason for divorce stated in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code has been realized. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 05.06.2012, 2011/21093 E., 2012/15178 K. The case concerns the request for divorce based on the legal grounds of committing a crime and living a dishonorable life as stated in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code.
Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil France Telegram Number Data Chamber, 05.06.2012, 2011/21093 E., 2012/15178 K. The case concerns the request for divorce based on the legal grounds of committing a crime and living a dishonorable life as stated in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber 09.11.2009, 2009/16450 E., 2009/19112 K. It is understood from the criminal court decision in the file that the defendant was sentenced to fifteen years of imprisonment with the decision numbered 170-5 dated 14.01.2010 of Aydın 1st High Criminal Court for the crime of intentional murder committed on 05.07.2009.
Although the material facts were proven by the defendant's confession and other evidence, the fact that the criminal court decision was not final was not deemed effective on the outcome. The act of intentional homicide is "humiliating" and, due to this nature, makes living together unbearable for the plaintiff spouse, and the plaintiff cannot be expected to live with someone who committed this crime. The reason for divorce stated in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code has been realized. Supreme Court of Appeals 2nd Civil Chamber, 05.06.2012, 2011/21093 E., 2012/15178 K. The case concerns the request for divorce based on the legal grounds of committing a crime and living a dishonorable life as stated in Article 163 of the Turkish Civil Code.